<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 – Ep 34 – Mediaweek Podcast – Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaweekpodcasts.com/2010-%e2%80%93-ep-34-%e2%80%93-mediaweek-podcast-%e2%80%93-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaweekpodcasts.com/2010-%e2%80%93-ep-34-%e2%80%93-mediaweek-podcast-%e2%80%93-radio/</link>
	<description>Weekly podcasts about the Australian media industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:22:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hyland</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaweekpodcasts.com/2010-%e2%80%93-ep-34-%e2%80%93-mediaweek-podcast-%e2%80%93-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hyland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaweekpodcasts.com/?p=497#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Interesting to hear Dan&#039;s comments about Classic Rock and compare to what I&#039;ve heard since the launch of Classic Rock. Personally, I&#039;m a fan of Classic Rock, as any station that grabs it&#039;s nuts and plays Have A Cigar-Pink Floyd is fine by me. I just wish the speakers in my &#039;93 Camry were better. Surprisingly, and I hope my GM doesn&#039;t read this, I don&#039;t miss the jocks. The programming features, imaging with artist grabs, news &amp; 15 minute traffic updates in drive make it sound busy enough. As Dan says, I think it&#039;s great that Classic Rock is purely classic rock and doesn&#039;t pretend to be anything else. 
Also, contrary to Dan&#039;s tongue in cheek comments, I&#039;ve listened to quite a few of these podcasts in their entirety and find them quite interesting. It&#039;s great to have access to industry professionals. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to hear Dan&#8217;s comments about Classic Rock and compare to what I&#8217;ve heard since the launch of Classic Rock. Personally, I&#8217;m a fan of Classic Rock, as any station that grabs it&#8217;s nuts and plays Have A Cigar-Pink Floyd is fine by me. I just wish the speakers in my &#8216;93 Camry were better. Surprisingly, and I hope my GM doesn&#8217;t read this, I don&#8217;t miss the jocks. The programming features, imaging with artist grabs, news &amp; 15 minute traffic updates in drive make it sound busy enough. As Dan says, I think it&#8217;s great that Classic Rock is purely classic rock and doesn&#8217;t pretend to be anything else.<br />
Also, contrary to Dan&#8217;s tongue in cheek comments, I&#8217;ve listened to quite a few of these podcasts in their entirety and find them quite interesting. It&#8217;s great to have access to industry professionals. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

